Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk

[RJack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 2/10/2010 10:08 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar
> > the entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from
> > SFLC for consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as 
> > http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2009/dec/14/busybox-gpl-lawsuit/
> > in which (1) "the Software Freedom Conservancy" is utterly
> > frivolous 'plaintiff' because it doesn't own ANY busybox copyrights
> > and (2) Erik Andersen is also utterly frivolous 'plaintiff' because
> > he was NOT joined by Bruce Perens and other contributors to the
> > joint work known as busybox at http://busybox.net/.
>
> The SFLC has had successful outcomes in every single case that it has
> filed - all defendants have come into compliance with the GPL. No
> defendant has chosen to fight the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs chose to file automatic involuntary dismissals before any
judge could ever read their frivolous Complaints. Why why would a
plaintiff answer a Complaint that has been dismissed?
ROFL

"The Captain's scared them out of the water!"
http://www.fini.tv/blog/finishing_line_files/a44f9390355368f87dc47b7ec094f93e-36.php

ROFL. ROFL. ROFL.

Sincerely,
RJack