|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: [News] SFLC Responds to Copyright Misconceptions, Presents Moglen Talk |
Date: | Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:18:20 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> > A compilation work which you call 'MacOSX' is a collective work (see >> > 17 USC 101 for both 'compilation' and 'collective work') of Apple and >> > only Apple, silly. >> >> Without any components with copyright by other parties? > > The copyright on components (distinct from the compilation work) is > totally separate/independent copyright (distinct from the copyright on > compilation) you retard dak. So for any component with copyrighted parts from other parties (like BSD), Apple could not sue for breach of copyright without having the other parties joining the suit? Reality check... -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |