[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
Date: |
Wed, 20 May 2009 15:00:37 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
> ...
Yes, the GPL is conformant with this requirement. Software linked with GPLed
libraries only inherits the GPL if it forms a single work, not any software
with which they are merely distributed.
Yes, this is exactly what I've been telling you. Why do you
quote this to me as if it means something opposite? What is
it about "forms a single work" that you don't understand?
- Re: GPL traitor !, (continued)
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/20
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/05/20