[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
From: |
Chris Ahlstrom |
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
Date: |
Wed, 6 May 2009 06:27:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) |
After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
this bit o' wisdom:
> In article <em5Ml.36994$i9.25373@bignews7.bellsouth.net>,
> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@launchmodem.com> wrote:
>> In any case, it is obvious that GPL 2 was very understandable by many many
>> people (e.g. Linus Torvalds), and they believed it served their interests
>> best.
>
> I take it you've never read the threads on the kernel list over whether
> or not binary drivers in the kernel violate GPL? There are a fair
> number of kernel developers (not to mention RMS and others from the FSF)
> who think Linus does *not* understand GPL.
Which version of the GPL?
In any case, my statement still stands, and is proven by history, not
opinion.
--
Every why hath a wherefore.
-- William Shakespeare, "A Comedy of Errors"
- Re: GPL traitor !, (continued)
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Thufir Hawat, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, DFS, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Thufir Hawat, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !,
Chris Ahlstrom <=
- Re: GPL traitor !, JEDIDIAH, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, JEDIDIAH, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Rjack, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Rjack, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, JEDIDIAH, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/07