[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
From: |
Tim Smith |
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
Date: |
Wed, 06 May 2009 00:37:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (Intel Mac OS X) |
In article <em5Ml.36994$i9.25373@bignews7.bellsouth.net>,
Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@launchmodem.com> wrote:
> In any case, it is obvious that GPL 2 was very understandable by many many
> people (e.g. Linus Torvalds), and they believed it served their interests
> best.
I take it you've never read the threads on the kernel list over whether
or not binary drivers in the kernel violate GPL? There are a fair
number of kernel developers (not to mention RMS and others from the FSF)
who think Linus does *not* understand GPL.
--
--Tim Smith
- Re: GPL traitor !, (continued)
- Re: GPL traitor !, Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Thufir Hawat, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, DFS, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Thufir Hawat, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !,
Tim Smith <=
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, JEDIDIAH, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, JEDIDIAH, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Rjack, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Rjack, 2009/05/07