[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:14:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@arcor.de> writes:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>
>>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>> [...]
>>> > They are correct Hymen. Section 2(b) is an *illegal* contractual
>>> > term.
>>>
>>> Just for the sake of playing with you: if that were a case, the legal
>>> document would be invalid.
>>
>> Dak, dak, dak. Are you still in Germany? Don't you know that resulting
>> from Harald Welte's "enforcement" actions in Germany, the courts ruled
>> that the GPL falls under
>
> Fine. You might try to present a link for that claim
> Posting a link to some courts decision which has obviously nothing to do
> with the GPL hardly counts as "evidence" of anything. Except for the
> suspicion that you are lying, again
Oh, in most cases he is citing actual court cases. They just don't
support anything he says. It is just material for head-scratching.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/25
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/25