|
From: | Hyman Rosen |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:07:25 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
amicus_curious wrote:
Actiontec was not an agent of Verizon. Verizon did not make the GPL for Actiontec devices available. Ergo your statement is false.
Verizon gets its routers from Actiontec. It makes firmware upgrades available through a URL containing "actiontec gateway". It's not at all clear that Verizon is involved in activities which bring it under the purview of the GPL. Ergo my statement has a good chance of being true.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |