Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Hyman Rosen]

Rjack wrote:
> Ummm. . . do you *really* believe that:
> "2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
> of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
> distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
> above . . ." doesn't offer a promise of copyright permissions?

It offers a promise of copyright permissions provided the license
terms are obeyed. What will this putative heartbroken claimant say
when the judge asks him why he didn't believe the clearly spelled
out obligations held?

Oh, wait, I know! He'll say he read it on Usenet!