|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:48:24 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack <user@example.net> writes:Unfortunately your "fallback" provision, that a failed contractcannot supply grounds for claims of promissory estoppel, is a figment of Richard Stallman's fertile imagination...How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise?
Ummm. . . do you *really* believe that: "2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1 above . . ." doesn't offer a promise of copyright permissions? Hmmm. . . Sincerely, Rjack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |