|
From: | amicus_curious |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Sat, 21 Feb 2009 09:10:20 -0500 |
"Rahul Dhesi" <c.c.eiftj@XReXXCopyr.usenet.us.com> wrote in message news:gnnqah$gv6$1@blue.rahul.net...
They suggested that the requirements were not meaningless to the copyright holders who get a thrill out of seeing their name in print, but that is meaningless to me. I think that it speaks ill of those egomaniacs who want to create such a ruckus just so that the world might see how smart they are. Pathetic."amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:I don't suggest that enforcement itself is the problem, it is the enforcement of meaningless requirements....The CAFC has ruled that these requirements are not meaningless. --
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |