[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:04:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes:
> I repeat, if it is a license it is a contract.
Because license terms are evaluated like contract terms? That's like
saying "if it is a horse, it is a dog" because both have 4 legs.
A license can't state contractual penalties. For license breaches, you
can demand damages, but not penalties.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/03
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", David Kastrup, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2008/12/04
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/05
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2008/12/09
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2008/12/09