[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:21:42 +0100

Hyman Rosen wrote:


> is one-way; people who want to use the rights it grants abide
> by its provisions, but they don't have a negotiated deal with
> the licensor.

That's like any other contract of adhesion with non-negotiated terms,
Hyman. Take it or leave it, as they say.

Anyway, what's your take on the following

"explanation of copyleft" and "freedom", Hyman?

Suppose that video is going
to be played in court in SFLC-like "copyright" case... could you imagine
the outcome? Please share your imagination, Hyman. TIA.


(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]