[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code
From: |
fnegroni |
Subject: |
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:50:38 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Jul 17, 7:22 am, s0s...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 15, 10:24 am, Juha Nieminen <nos...@thanks.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Campy Happer wrote:
> > > In the case of C++, this is not so.
> > > C++, with its multiple inheritance,
> > > templates, and vastly bloated class libraries
> > > such as STL and Boost, which permit and
> > > seem even to require illegible coding practices
> > > in which 5-deep derived classes are not
> > > unlikely, has led to the C++ equivalent
> > > of spaghetti code.
>
> > Go troll somewhere else, Linus Torvalds.
>
> Does Linus Torvalds not like C++?
No, he does not :-)
- C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Campy Happer, 2008/07/15
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code,
fnegroni <=
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Wolfgang Draxinger, 2008/07/17
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Tim Smith, 2008/07/18
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, terminator, 2008/07/19
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Juha Nieminen, 2008/07/19
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, James Kanze, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Alf P. Steinbach, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Alf P. Steinbach, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, lawrence . jones, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, James Kanze, 2008/07/20
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, peter koch, 2008/07/20