[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code
From: |
Keith Thompson |
Subject: |
Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:19:23 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Campy Happer <campyhapper@yahoo.com> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to bring to your attention a concept
> and a term for it that I think is long overdue.
[snip]
I would like to bring to your attention the fact that C and C++ are
two different languages. This may be appropriate in comp.lang.c++;
it's not appropriate in comp.lang.c or gnu.misc.discuss. Please
restrict any followups to comp.lang.c++. (I doubt that this will do
any good, but it's worth a try.)
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
- C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Campy Happer, 2008/07/15
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, fnegroni, 2008/07/17
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Wolfgang Draxinger, 2008/07/17
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, Tim Smith, 2008/07/18
- Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code, terminator, 2008/07/19