[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question
From: |
avesty |
Subject: |
Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:41:05 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Dec 27, 4:28 pm, rjack <danw6...@insightbb.com> wrote:
> ave...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I have a commercial application that is distributed packaged in an
> > installer that you can download. When a user installs the application
> > I wanted to install some GPL software at the same time.
>
> Do you really want
> to trust your commercial business to license interpretations
No, hence the questions.
I like the idea of the GPL and what it stands for, just not this
apparent openness to 'interpretation'. It seems there should be
definitive defendable answers to questions like the ones I have...
What I've read says I'll be ok, but I can't really afford to have to
find out whether or not a federal judge agrees with me.
That's the other reason I asked if there were lawyers that specialize
in this sort of thing...
- GPL Mere Aggregation question, avesty, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, John Hasler, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, rjack, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, David Kastrup, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question,
avesty <=
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, John Hasler, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, Barry Margolin, 2007/12/27
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, rjack, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, avesty, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, rjack, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, avesty, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/28
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, John Hasler, 2007/12/30
- Re: GPL Mere Aggregation question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/28