[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Dec 2007 22:01:35 +0100 (CET) |
> Focus. You seem to confuse this thread with a general "bash GNU"
> thread. Your argument that the boundaries of an operating system
> are to be defined by triviality was nonsense. That you don't
> like cat's options does not change that at all.
No more nonsensical than your attempt to define the boundaries of
an operating system to be the userspace utilities that GNU happen
to have produced. So gcc is part of the operating system. Would a
Pascal compiler form part of an operating system?
GCC includes a pascal compiler.
A Haskell compiler?
One could include a haskell compiler in a operating system, many GNU
variants have a haskell compiler, for example gNewSense
(http://www.gnewsense.org/)
How about gnuchess?
The GNU operating system includes GNU Chess, so do many GNU variants,
see above.
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, (continued)
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Brian, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Brian, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, John Hasler, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, mike3, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, rjack, 2007/12/07
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/08