[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL question
From: |
mike3 |
Subject: |
Re: GPL question |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:05:44 -0700 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Oct 14, 6:50 pm, John Hasler <j...@dhh.gt.org> wrote:
> mike3 writes:
> > So why not make a _clear and simple_ free-software license?
>
> "Things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler" --A. Einstein
>
> The GPLv2 is as simple as possible given it's goals. If you want something
> simpler for your software use the BSD.
OK. I'm curious, though, you mentioned the version 2. Is the
version 3 more complicated, then?
> --
> John Hasler
> j...@dhh.gt.org
> Dancing Horse Hill
> Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: GPL question, (continued)
- Re: GPL question, rjack, 2007/10/18
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/18
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/18
- Re: GPL question, rjack, 2007/10/19
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/20
- Re: GPL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/10/24
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, Mike Cox, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/14
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/14
- Re: GPL question,
mike3 <=
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/17
- Re: GPL question, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/10/17
- Message not available
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPL question, John Hasler, 2007/10/12
- Re: GPL question, mike3, 2007/10/12
Re: GPL question, n . torrey . pines, 2007/10/19