[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:36:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Drazen Kacar writes:
> USA is as arbitrary third location from my point of view. The whole USA,
> not just California. And I certainly don't want to be dragged in any USA
> court.
"Governed by California law" does not mean "governed by California courts".
It just means that whatever court is interpreting the license should apply
California law. Some courts may, of course, choose not to do so, but US
Federal courts will. So will ICC arbitration panels, I believe.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, (continued)
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Ceri Davies, 2006/10/19
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, James Carlson, 2006/10/19
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, David Kastrup, 2006/10/19
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/10/19
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, James Carlson, 2006/10/20
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Drazen Kacar, 2006/10/20
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/20
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Drazen Kacar, 2006/10/20
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/24
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/10/20
- Re: Gentoo Linux copyright / CDDL question, Casper H . S . Dik, 2006/10/19