[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL and other licences
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: GPL and other licences |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:22:36 +0000 |
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 19:19 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> You ask how a copy would be acquired without accepting the GPL.
Irrelevant. You still don't have the right to make copies and distribute
those copies unless you are authorized, even if you got the software as
a gift :)
If the author has authorized you because he licensed it as Free
Software, great. If not, you can't make any copies and distribute them.
Rui
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: GPL and other licences, (continued)
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Lee Hollaar, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/02
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/02
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/03
- Re: GPL and other licences, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/02/03
Re: GPL and other licences, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/02/01
Re: GPL and other licences, David Kastrup, 2006/02/01