Re: Question about the GPL copyrightnoticeandthestatementofcopying permission not being included inallthesourcefiles of aproduct.

[Alexander Terekhov]

Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
[...]
>      FSF general counsel Eben Moglen said on Thursday. "We will not
>      produce material that is the subject of attorney-client privilege,
>              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>      and I don't think anybody expects us to."

Read the subpeana, stupid. Hint: "(d) DUTIES IN RESPONING TO SUBPOENA", 
paragraph (2). The stuff SCO wants is more like this:

http://www.xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004308.html

BTW, FSF's "GPL Compliance Lab" is run by non-lawyer(s)/non-attorney(s). 
It's run by "compilence engineer(s)" (my, what a perverse sense of humor) 
and hence it's not privileged irrespective of whatever Moglen claims.

regards,
alexander.