[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk"
From: |
asj |
Subject: |
Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk" |
Date: |
24 May 2004 09:50:12 -0700 |
Jango Johnny <a@hoo.a.hey> wrote in message
news:<19044886.bv4EOGkiRo@news.west.earthlink.net>...
> Bureaucracies, when driven by fear, or irrationality, will do many things.
> It is not hard to conceive of a group of Microsoft /executives/ -- trying
> to assuage the *boss* that Microsoft is all big and powerful still
> ( ooooo ), that they should embark on a headlong and foolish quest to
> patent/ everything.
well, no argument there.
>
>
> > and lotus is alive and well as a division in IBM.
>
> COUGH...CHOKE...Spit take!
>
> C'mon. Are you telling me that Lotus now, is what Lotus then ( before
> Excel ) was ? Are you ?
read again: "lotus is alive and well as a division in IBM."
did i say anything beyond that?
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", (continued)
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Linønut, 2004/05/21
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", anoncoward, 2004/05/22
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Guess My Sphincta, 2004/05/22
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", anoncoward, 2004/05/22
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Rob S. Pierre, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Guess My Sphincta, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Rolf Tollerud, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Jango Johnny, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", asj, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Jango Johnny, 2004/05/24
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk",
asj <=
- Mono, Now, Jango Johnny, 2004/05/23
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", Richard Corfield, 2004/05/28
- Re: "Why Mono is Currently An Unacceptable Risk", asj, 2004/05/23