Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters

[David Kastrup]

darkred@myway.com (Snuffelluffogus) writes:

> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message 
> news:<x53c6dnv90.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>...
> > darkred@myway.com (Snuffelluffogus) writes:
> > 
> > > Martin Dickopp <expires-2004-06-30@zero-based.org> wrote in message 
> > > news:<cunbrl1ztr4.fsf@zero-based.org>...
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but the latter is not obvious to me
> > > > at all.  What goods are impossible to produce due to cheap
> > > > reproduction?
> > > 
> > > It's called profit. In order to run a business, one has to make a
> > > minimal profit, just to have a desk to sit behind.
> > 
> > Thanks for caring, but I make a profit just fine creating free
> > software.
> 
> One datum. And your actions are unethical.

Another one.  And you are a dimwit if you consider being a productive
member of society unethical.

> > It is called progress.  It does not make sense to constantly
> > reinvent the wheel just to keep busy.
> 
> Funny, most for-profit companies don't do that.

Then why would they have a problem with free wheels being available?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum