Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters

[Snuffelluffogus]

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message 
news:<x53c6dnv90.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>...
> darkred@myway.com (Snuffelluffogus) writes:
> 
> > Martin Dickopp <expires-2004-06-30@zero-based.org> wrote in message 
> > news:<cunbrl1ztr4.fsf@zero-based.org>...
> > > 
> > > Maybe I'm missing something, but the latter is not obvious to me
> > > at all.  What goods are impossible to produce due to cheap
> > > reproduction?
> > 
> > It's called profit. In order to run a business, one has to make a
> > minimal profit, just to have a desk to sit behind.
> 
> Thanks for caring, but I make a profit just fine creating free
> software.

One datum. And your actions are unethical.

> It is called progress.  It does not make sense to constantly reinvent
> the wheel just to keep busy.

Funny, most for-profit companies don't do that.