[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.

From: Marius Bakke
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium.
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2019 17:33:21 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.28.1 ( Emacs/26.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)


Amin Bandali <address@hidden> writes:

> Marius, if I understand correctly, you have summarized your patch with
> respect to the following two issues:
> 1. Your patch strips out parts of Chromium that are /clearly/ nonfree
>    and proprietary (e.g. unrar per your example), and
> 2. Your patch addresses (or tries to) privacy concerns.
> But as far as I can tell, you have not addressed the concerns shared by
> Bill and others about the situation with files in the Chromium codebase
> that don’t have a clear license.  So I’ll try to repeat/rephrase their
> question(s): does your patch address the files with unclear license?
> Does it strip out those files that don’t have a clear license?  Can we
> be certain that the Chromium built from your patch explicitly *only*
> contained free software?

Can you point out one or more files with an unclear license?  Do we have
any reason to distrust what's written in the LICENSE file?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]