[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNU-linux-libre] potentially tained/non-free software

From: Karl Goetz
Subject: [GNU-linux-libre] potentially tained/non-free software
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:27:58 +1100

Hi all,
I'm going back through some gNS bugs and I've come across some we
hadn't actioned yet. I'd like to bring them to the lists attention, and
if everyone agrees they are problematic I'll add them to NONFSDG.

bogofilter has some non-free files
-> I've uploaded a freed version to gNS (without the files)

BEAV Has A Non-Commercial Clause
-> I've blacklisted this in gNS

Blender License Problems
-> I'm preparing a freed version without the {publ_,}installer dirs

batik_1.7 has a non-free file
-> I'm not sure if its sane to repack a .jar, I'll need to investigate

bacula has a freedom problem
- could i get some input on this bug please? Does anyone else agree
  with jasons interpretation of the licence? if its generally agreed to
  be a problem i'll report a bug in debian. This appears to be the same
  as ,
  so the answer would be good there too :)

In all but the last case I've got debian bugs/input outstanding (to be
mailed as soon as i figure out why my mail isn't sending atm).
Hopefully they will help push the issues upstream.

Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS)
No, I won't join your social networking group

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]