Re: [Gnu-arch-users] caching revisions

[Johannes Berg]

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 15:05 +0200, Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
> Ok. Thank you. As long as revision is cached I don't need anything else.

Actually, you should uncacherev and re-cacherev as the tar file is most
likely not bitwise identical to the first one. Part of the bug is that
the tar.gz is replaced, but the checksum is not, leading to an invalid
checksum on future checks of the cached revision (in effect not having a
cacherev)

johannes

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part