Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork

[Matthew Dempsky]

Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:

> My thinking has been that we should probably start consistently using
> s-exp based syntaxes and making sure that they pun as something that
> could be a macro.   That way, among other wins, we have less worry
> about extending the syntaxes in the future.

I wouldn't mind that at all except that it means first we'll need a
s-exp parser for tla to use.

>   I think that, therefore, we'll want "tla/libawk"
> to be a lot more serious --- basically to be just the data-structure
> foo from xl plus relational operators on top of that.

So I should first extend libawk with s-exp foo?  Any recommendations
on API?  (I'll take another look at xl's reader stuff.)