[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] possible bug with version number sorting
From: |
Mirian Crzig Lennox |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] possible bug with version number sorting |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 10:50:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) |
I have encountered some perplexing behaviour in the way that tla
decides which version on a branch is the most recent.
In a particular category (call it "foo"), I have the following
versions:
foo--devel--0.1
foo--devel--0.1.1
foo--devel--0.1.2
foo--devel--0.1.3
foo--devel--0.1.4
The original version was foo--devel--0.1, the others are related as
so:
tla tag foo--devel--0.1--patch-6 foo--devel--0.1.1
tla tag foo--devel--0.1.1--patch-2 foo--devel--0.1.2
tla tag foo--devel--0.1.2--patch-4 foo--devel--0.1.3
tla tag foo--devel--0.1.3--patch-11 foo--devel--0.1.4
I then wanted to get the latest development sources
(foo--devel--0.1.4--patch-7); I assumed I simply do:
tla get foo--devel
But, to my surprise, I got moo--cosmic-devel--0.1--patch-6 instead.
This was with (tla--devo--1.1--patch-237). I'm hoping that this is
not intentional, because it certainly runs counter to the way people
commonly arrange version numbers (e.g., gcc-3.2 < gcc-3.2.1,
FreeBSD-4.6 < FreeBSD-4.6.2, openssh-3.7 < openssh-3.7.1, etc.)
cheers,
Mirian
- [Gnu-arch-users] possible bug with version number sorting,
Mirian Crzig Lennox <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] possible bug with version number sorting, Paul Pelzl, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] possible bug with version number sorting, Robert Collins, 2003/12/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Stig Brautaset, 2003/12/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Miles Bader, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2003/12/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Tom Lord, 2003/12/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2003/12/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Tom Lord, 2003/12/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: possible bug with version number sorting, Mirian Crzig Lennox, 2003/12/13