[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call
From: |
Andrea Arcangeli |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 01:07:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 03:37:15PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
>
> > From: Charles Duffy <address@hidden>
>
> > Incidentally: bkcvs makes some guarantees [every revision in a given
> > changeset at the same timestamp, no two changesets at the same
> > timestamp] that make it ideal for doing a perfectly accurate cscvs-style
> > reconstruction very easily...
>
>
> I don't follow BK very closely. I sample lkml from time to time is
> about it.
>
> One thing I saw go by sounded as if LM was saying their would be
> tar-bundled (traditional) patch-sets for each BK revision of every
> bkbits project. Is that right? If so, wouldn't _that_ be a very
> easy source to use for cross-revctl-system mirroring?
yes, that's the ideal source infact (cvs also loses the email domain as
I learnt the hard way ;). That's a good point, we may prefer to defer
adding any bkcvs in cscvs until we hear something definitive from Larry.
If he start exporting the changesets in a different protocol (not cvs),
then maybe it's better to write an importer for it, so it'll work for
all projects hosted at bitmover, not just the kernel.
Andrea - If you prefer relying on open source software, check these links:
rsync.kernel.org::pub/scm/linux/kernel/bkcvs/linux-2.[45]/
http://www.cobite.com/cvsps/
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, John Goerzen, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Charles Duffy, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, John Goerzen, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers,
Andrea Arcangeli <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Miles Bader, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Miles Bader, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Charles Duffy, 2003/09/30