[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call
From: |
John Goerzen |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:28:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:00:22PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Are you considering cscvs "ready" at such time as you're able to run in
> > front-to-back even with the 2 redundant changesets (on average) for each
> For a final "official" import having the bkcvs knowledge sounds
> reasonable. Note that it's much easier to use the bkcvs changeset
> numbers in the logs to deduce the patchsets for arch than to guess them
> with an heuristic.
I agree. "Ready" is vague. Right now, I'll define "ready" as "the thing
imports correctly and works in a reasonable amount of time." Later we'll
define "ready" as "a 1:1 ratio exists for BK changesets to Arch changesets,
and all renames/moves are tracked."
-- John
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, John Goerzen, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Charles Duffy, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers,
John Goerzen <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Miles Bader, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cscvs--experimental--1.1 nearing doneness; call for testers, Miles Bader, 2003/09/30