[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch
From: |
Samium Gromoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:45:42 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.11.7 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:28:09 -0700 (PDT),
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, David Brown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:04:08PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > > It'll work when tricks are applied (not recognize untagged thingies). But
> > > at that point why would I need tagline at all ? I'll never use the
> > > tag-line:
> > > feature in my sources. Look, is like saying that you want to eat some
> > > pineapple. You can either buy a pineapple cake (tagline) and throw away
> > > tha cake (tag-line: feature) or you can just buy the pineapple (explicit).
> >
> > I don't understand. These two things aren't related. Assuming that you
> > mean the pineapple is the file tag, you have one of two places you can
> > store it, either in the file, or in an explicit tag. With tagline, and
> > unrecognized untagged things (which is not a trick, just new), a file
> > tag can be in one of two places:
> >
> > - in an external tag, added with tla add.
> > - in an arch-tag: line in the file itself.
> >
> > Otherwise, there isn't any significant difference between these.
> > However, when the tag is inside the file, it makes lots of other
> > operations more convenient.
> >
> > Tagline isn't pineapple cake, your choices are pineapple in a box, or in
> > a can. Either way, you just get pineapple.
>
> This is getting philosophical more than practical. We all agree that
> tagline+trick is same as explicit, isn't it ? Yes, both obtain what I
Ok, now i hope we got to the bottom of the issue.
What _exactly_ is that "trick" you are talking about?
> want. Now, I can choose tagline and edit the =tagging-method file, or I
> can choose explicit directly. I'll stick with explicit. You are welcome to
> translate explicit to tagline+file_edit if you like.
>
>
>
> - Davide
regards, Samium Gromoff
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Miles Bader, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, David Brown, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch,
Samium Gromoff <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] named patches, patch order, patch queue manager (was: the infinite thread), Tom Lord, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager (was: the infinite thread), Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/28