[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch
From: |
Robert Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch |
Date: |
29 Sep 2003 23:17:23 -0700 |
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 22:51, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2003, Miles Bader wrote:
>
> > Davide Libenzi <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > > Personally I do see some of Andrea points. I'm using explicit tagging
> > > > > because, like Andrea, I do want to commit strictly.
> > > >
> > > > What is the source of this canard? What does "strict commits" have to
> > > > do with explicit tagging? Please explain your thought process.
> > >
> > > I do fairly often use-and-trash C (or Perl or whatever) test source
> > > files that are used to test something and that I do not want to be
> > > included in my commits.
> >
> > ... so use `tagline; untagged-source junk'
> >
> > result: files random are not committed unless you explicit tag them (via
> > `tila add' or by adding a tagline).
>
> I know, but what's the point of having tagline for me ? I will never use
> the tag-line: inside my sources and I will always require an add-tag with
> my usage pattern. Look, I'm not saying to nuke tagline. I'm just saying
> that tagline+tricks == explicit for me.
"I'm using explicit tagging... because I want to commit strictly" is
like saying "I chose to buy a Volkswagen because I insist on diesel
fuel." It simply doesn't follow.
And untagged-source is not a "trick" anymore than any inventory
parameter is a "trick."
Bob
PS Never say never.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: give us a hand with arch, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: give us a hand with arch, Ethan Benson, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Miles Bader, 2003/09/30
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch,
Robert Anderson <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Andrea Arcangeli, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, David Brown, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: give us a hand with arch, Davide Libenzi, 2003/09/30