[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory
From: |
Jani Monoses |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:23:24 +0300 |
>
> I think you're probably going to lose on this point though, unless an
> overwhelming majority of people come out against {arch}.
They are the not-so-brave Lurkers who are afraid to open their mouth
(myself included) knowing that whining without having contributed to the
project is not well regared and I perfectly understand that.
With the risk of being ridiculed isn't the {} convention more on
the policy instead of the mechanism side of things? the fact that it's
the first thing shown in emacs buffers is a subjective point of view.
Jani
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, (continued)
[Gnu-arch-users] {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Miles Bader, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory,
Jani Monoses <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Charles Duffy, 2003/09/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Neil Stevens, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Tom Lord, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: {arch} directory, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/26