[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?
From: |
Dustin Sallings |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:14:20 -0700 |
On Thursday, Sep 25, 2003, at 18:58 US/Pacific, Miles Bader wrote:
(1) Using individual files for explicit tags
This is a good point. It seems like creating a single inventory tag
file per directory would help performance as well as inode
conservation. It would make add, move, and delete more complicated, of
course, but more common operations wouldn't be any more complicated.
--
SPY My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?,
Dustin Sallings <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Robin Farine, 2003/09/26
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd), Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/26