[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so go
From: |
Jason McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:02:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Miles Bader wrote:
> I typically update from Tom's sources after reading an email message
> saying `just added feature X,' so the long latency of a cron-updated
> mirror is a burden (usually what would happen is, I'd do an update, see
> nothing changed, be puzzled for a split-second, and then go "oh yeah"
> and update my local mirror and try again). It also turned out that the
> actual amount of data transfer was _more_ with the mirror than with a
> direct connection, because I typically only do a few operations; with a
> mirror, I either had to remember to use a very specific limit for the
> mirroring command (and worry about what it should be -- it depends on
> what changed), but the direct connection basically transfers exactly
> what I need.
Having to give a certain limit argument to keep a minimal mirror is why
I proposed a --revisions-only argument to push-mirror last week. It
seems like a very useful option (it would push only revisions whose
version already existed in your local mirror). Too bad I don't have
enough time to implement it ;-)
Jason
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good,
Jason McCarty <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] situations where cached revisions are not so good, Robert Collins, 2003/09/24
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24