[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good
From: |
Stig Brautaset |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:26:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sep 24 2003, Miles wrote:
> Stig Brautaset <address@hidden> writes:
> > > Someone recently asked me to add a cached revision for my emacs archive,
> > > which according to the conventional wisdom would make sense, since
> > > there's quite a few changesets in there.
> >
> > There's an option to push-mirror to not mirror cached revisions, so you
> > can have the best of both worlds. :)
>
> Actually, that doesn't help at all, it's an entirely orthogonal problem.
>
> The problem I'm having has to do with whether using a cached revision is
> the best thing for a _user_ of an archive, which varies depending on the
> user's environment (plus details of the source tree involved), not the
> server's.
I fail to see why --no-cache is orthogonal to your problem. If people
are on a slow line and need to get to your stuff often (or even
occasionally) they should run their own mirror. Thus you can put cached
revisions in _your_ mirror, but people are free to only mirror the
cached revisions if they want to.
Stig
--
brautaset.org
- [Gnu-arch-users] situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Stig Brautaset, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good,
Stig Brautaset <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Robert Collins, 2003/09/28