[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good
From: |
Stig Brautaset |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:00:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sep 24 2003, Miles wrote:
> Someone recently asked me to add a cached revision for my emacs archive,
> which according to the conventional wisdom would make sense, since
> there's quite a few changesets in there.
There's an option to push-mirror to not mirror cached revisions, so you
can have the best of both worlds. :)
tla push-mirror --no-cache -A address@hidden <limit>
--
brautaset.org
- [Gnu-arch-users] situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good,
Stig Brautaset <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Stig Brautaset, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Miles Bader, 2003/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Jason McCarty, 2003/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: situations where cached revisions are not so good, Tom Lord, 2003/09/27