[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id |
Date: |
20 Sep 2003 08:47:55 +0900 |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > tla link
>
> > That seems to fit intuitively to all use cases, to me.
>
> I very much like that having failed at searching for the right word.
That sounds good to me; it seems to exactly capture what's going on
(to tell the truth, something does feel sort of funny about the term
`link', but I can't find any logical reason for this feeling, so I'll
chalk it up to familiarity with the old term).
My current thought is that it's best to change both -- still change
tag->id for file ids, but _also_ change the `tag' command to `link'.
> My current concern is the tutorial. As I mentioned to miles, I'm
> halfway through a big update to it. Any change such as that requires
> tutorial updates not only to the "code snippets" that mention command
> names, but also to the english text that builds on the command names.
It's fine with me. The changes I'm proposing are very surface level, so
I don't think any real rewriting is required, just a few search-replaces
and a check to catch any oddities.
[But it's probably a good idea to wait until you're finished with your
current tutorial changes -- so please post a note when you're done.]
Thanks,
-Miles
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come. --Nietzsche
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Zack Brown, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Stig Brautaset, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Dustin Sallings, 2003/09/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: *-tag -> *->id, Tom Lord, 2003/09/19
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Miles Bader, 2003/09/19
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19