[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls |
Date: |
19 Sep 2003 17:00:23 +0900 |
Pau Aliagas <address@hidden> writes:
> I miss a way to see the patch logs inside the different log versions, that
> is the same output than current log-ls specifying one of the versions.
> So, If we move in this direction, we should consider to add this option
> too.
Of course; log-ls already does that, there's no reason to remove the
functionality.
-miles
--
[|nurgle|] ddt- demonic? so quake will have an evil kinda setting? one that
will make every christian in the world foamm at the mouth?
[iddt] nurg, that's the goal
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/19
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: UI change proposal: logs vs. log-ls, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/19