|
From: | Paul Snively |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Ruminations on Arch Desiderata |
Date: | Wed, 17 Sep 2003 21:30:39 -0700 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 09:20 AM, Tom Lord wrote:
From: Paul Snively <address@hidden>I'm always surprised when people propose essentially social solutions and expect them not to have unacceptable failure rates. :-)Sometimes the possibility of that kind of failure is a feature, not a bug. "Unacceptable" to whom?
In the context that I'm thinking of at the moment, anyone who feels they had an opportunity cost thrust upon them because there was a communication breakdown and the "well-known service" wasn't known to them, despite their having the right collaborative tool(s) and being on the local network.
Certainly voluntary withdrawal is fine; it's involuntary withdrawal that I'm suggesting is a worthwhile problem to investigate.To the members of a group that ceases to cooperate? Apparently not.
-t
Best regards, Paul -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAj9pNPYACgkQugPBK9DeterJEgCgzEUAiKyseScws3jODs7rIVYU wVwAnjrCna8u0qW/sUhgCSnS4uxihRWd =mxx6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |