[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans
From: |
David Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:30:35 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:02:17PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> Would ".cvsignore" functionality do the trick? Off the top of my
> head, I think that'd be cheap and easy, compared to "full relative
> path regexps" foo.
Opencm has an .opencm-rules file which can contain lines that state
either
exclude re
or
include re
(although re is a glob style pattern).
The include is useful to override the global exclusion of a certain
name.
Dave
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Florian Weimer, 2003/09/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Robert Collins, 2003/09/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Colin Walters, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans,
David Brown <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Robert Anderson, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Colin Walters, 2003/09/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.1 plans, Miles Bader, 2003/09/15
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans, Tom Lord, 2003/09/16