Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans

[Miles Bader]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:56:08PM -0400, Miles Bader wrote:
> > So there's a cost/benefit question here and what I'm wondering (and
> > taking as a hypothesis) is that the untagged-source foo is ample here.
> 
> I must admit that I can't see at all how untagged-source (useful though it
> is) has any connection with directory-specific regexp matching...

Oh, wait, I think I see what you're saying: people could mark untagged
files as being ignored or something instead of putting them in a regexp.

I really don't think that works for me though -- I _want_ untagged files to
be flagged as errors, because I often forget to add tags (obviously with
emacs, where new files can come from CVS, but also with my personal
projects!).

-Miles
-- 
We live, as we dream -- alone....