|
From: | Ollivier Robert |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Ongoing Comparison Between Version Control Systems |
Date: | Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:48:42 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.3i |
According to Shlomi Fish: > >From what I understood Perforce exhibits a very similar architecture to > CVS (a directory tree of individual RCS-like files) and has a similar > command set. (using different command maybe but with the same semantics). That's too short a description to give Perforce credits. Perforce is indeed implemented with a set of RCS files but all metadata is put into a set of .db files/tables and its features set is much bigger than CVS. It has true and easy branching, atomic commits and all that. Don't be driven by the command set only :) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- address@hidden Darwin snuadh.freenix.org Kernel Version 6.6: Thu May 1 21:48:54 PDT 2003
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |