[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch)
From: |
Pawel Kot |
Subject: |
Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch) |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:12:11 +0100 |
>>> address@hidden 24 February 2003 15:04:44 >>>
> is it possible to sent several messages and got reply in random
order
> with nokia phones?
To my knowledge -- no.
> just for the sake of completeness communication protocol of Dancall
phones
> is in cvs now [1], so i'll provide some additional informations here
> (IMHO) usefull for statemachine design:
>
> 1) before any frame is sent to phone, driver has to check if there
are
> no unconfirmed frames. better way of course is always finish
> transaction (see point 2).
Why? How can there be any unconfirmed frames?
> currently i'm using terribly hacked gnokii to communicate with
dancall
> and i can say that communication is quite stable and is even possible
to
> disconnect serial cable for a while without data lose :) code in cvs
is
Cool.
> not what i'm describing here, because it was not possible to commit
it
> without changing statemachine. i can upload it somewhere if anyone
is
> interested.
Please do.
pkot
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), (continued)
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Osma Suominen, 2003/02/18
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Ruotger . Skupin, 2003/02/18
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Ladislav Michl, 2003/02/24
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), BORBELY Zoltan, 2003/02/24
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Pawel Kot, 2003/02/24
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), BORBELY Zoltan, 2003/02/24
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Osma Suominen, 2003/02/25
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Christopher Kemp, 2003/02/25
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (NEW patch), Osma Suominen, 2003/02/25
- Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch), Ladislav Michl, 2003/02/25
Re: 3110 statemachine handling (patch),
Pawel Kot <=