|
From: | Raymond Toy |
Subject: | Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable] |
Date: | Sat, 14 Jan 2023 16:11:54 -0800 |
It would be interesting to hear of a few benchmarks. What observations to make?WASM advocates seem to hold that WASM codeexecutes fast and efficient.
How long would one expect (under realistic constraints) a computer system to take to download a completeCommon Lisp system + Maxima (compiled from Lisp to WASM?) into (say) a Chrome browser?
_______________________________________________There are many possible benchmarks to compare different features, like bignum arithmetic, polynomial arithmetic,input/output, the Maxima testsuite.On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 11:17 AM Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote:Re: emscripten version of ECL:
You can attempt to build it yourself:
https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/tree/emscripten
-----Original Message-----
From: Marius Gerbershagen <marius.gerbershagen@gmail.com>
Sent: Jan 14, 2023 9:39 AM
To: <maxima-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: <gcl-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Maxima-discuss] gcl-2.6.13 released [stable]
It's perhaps worth noting that ECL can be made to run in this way in a browser and will officially support WASM in the next release (https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/merge_requests/277).
<snip>
Maxima-discuss mailing list
Maxima-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |