g-wrap-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: G-Wrap 1.9.0 pending, any wishes?


From: Andreas Rottmann
Subject: Re: G-Wrap 1.9.0 pending, any wishes?
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:49:16 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:

> Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> Thanks for the reminder. I just merged this.
>
> Great.  Another thing.  I see:
>
>    +Summary: eliminate dead code
>    +Keywords:
>    +
>    +eliminate dead code
>    +
>
>    -static SCM
>    -gw_user_module_binder_proc (SCM module, SCM sym, SCM definep)
>    -{
>    -  SCM latent_variables_hash, pair, val, var;
>    -
>    -  latent_variables_hash =
>
>
> But then, recompiling guile-gnome (fresh checkout):
>
>    guile-gnome-gw-atk.c: In function `gw_init_wrapset_gnome_atk':
>    guile-gnome-gw-atk.c:1809: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> `gw_guile_make_latent_variable'
>    make[4]: *** [libgw_guile_gnome_atk_la-guile-gnome-gw-atk.lo] Fout 1
>    make[4]: Leaving directory 
> `/home/janneke/arch/test/guile-gnome/=build/atk/gnome/gw'
>
> Do you have patches that are waiting to go in
> address@hidden, or what am I missing?
>
Oh shit. I asked Wingo about the code I thought was dead, but he
didn't response. I thought I checked guile-gnome for uses, but
obviously missed it. I'll revert the patch.

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

I have a truly elegant proof of the  above, but it is too long to
fit into this .signature file.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]