[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine
From: |
suzuki toshiya |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine |
Date: |
Sat, 04 May 2013 07:41:15 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121122 Icedove/10.0.11 |
I apologize that I could not participate 64-bit cleaning for
new CFF engine, I'm quite sorry.
On 05/04/2013 02:11 AM, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG<address@hidden> writes:
>
> WL> Thanks. So `int' is 32bit.
>
> The only system I'm aware of where int was 64 bits was alpha. (Cray's
> first alpha systems went so far as to have sizeof(char)==sizeof(int)==
> sizeof(long)==sizeof(int64_t)==1.)
Just curious, Cray UNICOS had any 32 or 16-bit types?
> Everyone else, as far as I remember, kept int==int32_t to avoid the
> porting issues seen on ILP64.
Indeed, later alpha based systems I had (e.g. DEC OSF/1) was LP64,
I remember.
> Certainly all of amd64, arm64, sparc64, mips64, ppc64 are I32/LP64.
According to Wikipedia, there was a port of Solaris to sparc64 with
ILP64 architecture, although I've never had a chance to access it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/64-bit#64-bit_data_models
Regards,
mpsuzuki
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/04
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, octoploid, 2013/05/04
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/04
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, octoploid, 2013/05/04
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/05
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Ross Lagerwall, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, vernon adams, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, James Cloos, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine,
suzuki toshiya <=
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/05/03