[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault
From: |
Koblinger Egmont |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault |
Date: |
Mon, 10 May 2004 00:52:04 +0200 (CEST) |
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> defined; and run a web browser with "export FT2_DEBUG=any:9".
> Comparing the debug output of 2.1.8 and that of 2.1.7, I hope we can do
> something.
With any:9 I didn't get any output at all. any:6 seemed to be the most
verbose debug option. The result is imho a little bit too large to be sent
in e-mail, so here you can grab them:
http://www.cs.bme.hu/~egmont/freetype/
> Of course, gdb's backtrace is also good.
I'd gladly sent these if I knew how to, but unfortunately I have
absolutely no experience with any debuggers. So in case you need it,
please tell me precisely in a few words what to do.
thx,
Egmont
- [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Koblinger Egmont, 2004/05/09
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Masatake YAMATO, 2004/05/09
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault,
Koblinger Egmont <=
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Masatake YAMATO, 2004/05/10
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Koblinger Egmont, 2004/05/10
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/05/10
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Koblinger Egmont, 2004/05/10
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/05/11
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/05/10
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Koblinger Egmont, 2004/05/10
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Masatake YAMATO, 2004/05/10
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Koblinger Egmont, 2004/05/10
- Re: [Devel] gnome browsers segfault, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/05/11