Re: [freesci-develop] opinions on requiring C99 support?

[Matt]

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:

> You wrote:
>
> > I am fairly certain that GCC 3.3 and above are available on all of the
> > current target platforms, judging from some brief research. I'm totally
> > happy to hear good reasons why not to move forward with this requirement.
>
> Isn't FreeSCI also being built on Windows/VS?  Visual Studio's c99
> support is nonexistent...

VS2005 and above has great C99 and ISO C++ support, in my experience. 
Anything that can compile boost and pass all boost's unit tests out of the 
box has to be doing something right ;>

Maybe you're thinking of the dark ages of VC++ 6.0? :)

--
tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
http://www.clock.org/~matt