[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda) |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2023 08:34:48 +0000 |
Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:
> On 01/02/2023 20:26, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>>
>> There is potential confusion coming from the different interpretations
>> of the time zone offsets used in ISO8601 and POSIX TZ specs:
>
> Ihor, I am sorry that I did not reply to your early question.
>
> Is there a strong reason to support POSIX TZ? Time zones with fixed
> offsets are available as e.g. Etc/GMT-8 (unfortunately inverted sign as
> well).
Because `encode-time' accepts POSIX TZ as argument. So, may as well.
Note that Etc/GMT-8 is also accepted as POSIX TZ.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info, (continued)
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info, Max Nikulin, 2023/02/01
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO, Heinz Tuechler, 2023/02/02
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO, tomas, 2023/02/02
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO, Heinz Tuechler, 2023/02/02
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO, Max Nikulin, 2023/02/04
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info, tomas, 2023/02/02
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/02
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Max Nikulin, 2023/02/01
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda),
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Max Nikulin, 2023/02/02
- Re: POSIX TS spec reverses the meaning of TZ offset compared to ISO (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/02
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/01
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/02
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/03
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/04
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Jean Louis, 2023/02/05
- Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/05
Re: [POLL] Proposed syntax for timestamps with time zone info (was: [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/01